History
  • No items yet
midpage
Major v. Dannelly
220 S.W. 1110
Tex. App.
1920
Check Treatment

After the appellant had filed a motion to dismiss the appeal in this case, the appellee filed his briefs, asking for an affirmance, with damages for delay. The plaintiff in the court below, appellant here, recovered nothing in the lower court. There is no basis for the assessment of damages for delay. R.S. art. 1627; Hicks v. Murphy,162 S.W. 925. Under the circumstances it can make no material difference to appellees whether the judgment be affirmed or the appeal dismissed.

We will therefore not take the time to examine into the questions of law necessary to determine whether there was any error in the judgment, but will sustain the appellant's motion and dismiss the appeal.

Case Details

Case Name: Major v. Dannelly
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Apr 14, 1920
Citation: 220 S.W. 1110
Docket Number: No. 1626.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.