History
  • No items yet
midpage
265 S.W.3d 280
Mo. Ct. App.
2008

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, James Mahurin, appeals from the judgment dismissing his Rule 24.035 motion as untimely. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and find that no error of law appears. Therefore, an opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been given a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: Mahurin v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 18, 2008
Citations: 265 S.W.3d 280; 2008 WL 707291; 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 359; ED 89373
Docket Number: ED 89373
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Mahurin v. State, 265 S.W.3d 280