History
  • No items yet
midpage
71 Ohio St. 3d 95
Ohio
1994

Lead Opinion

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings and recommendations of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months, with the suspension to be stayed on the condition that no disciplinary complaints against respondent are certified to the board by a probable cause panel during that time. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., dissent. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would publicly reprimand respondent.





Dissenting Opinion

Wright, J.,

dissenting. I dissent, because I would not stay respondent’s suspension of six months.

Moyer, C.J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Case Details

Case Name: Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. DiMartino
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 7, 1994
Citations: 71 Ohio St. 3d 95; 642 N.E.2d 342; No. 94-1861
Docket Number: No. 94-1861
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. DiMartino, 71 Ohio St. 3d 95