History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mahoney v. McGuire
66 N.Y.2d 622
NY
1985
Check Treatment

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs. We agree with the Appellate Division that the addition of the word "forthwith” to the statutory provisions in question does not alter the rule of Matter of Pierne v Valentine (291 NY 333, 342) but, rather, only precludes an unnecessary or unwarranted delay which is not presented in this case.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone.

Case Details

Case Name: Mahoney v. McGuire
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 8, 1985
Citation: 66 N.Y.2d 622
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.