History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mahon v. Sewell
1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1190
New York Court of Common Pleas
1889
Check Treatment
Daly, J.

The appellant does not bring himself within the rule for granting rearguments as laid down by the court. Curley v. Tomlinson, 5 Daly, 283. He does not show that any question decisive of the case has been overlooked by the court, nor that the decision is in conflict with an express statute, or with a controlling decision of the court. This is an application to re-argue the case upon the points and authorities upon which it has been already heard and disposed of. The application should be denied, with $10 costs. All concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Mahon v. Sewell
Court Name: New York Court of Common Pleas
Date Published: Dec 2, 1889
Citation: 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1190
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.