32:T529,{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Legislation","name":"Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Carter County, 54 P.2d 155","datePublished":"1936-01-28","legislationDate":"1936-01-28","citation":"Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Carter County, 54 P.2d 155 (Okla. 1936)","countryOfOrigin":"USA","jurisdiction":"Supreme Court of Oklahoma","description":"Read the full text of Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Carter County (Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Carter County, 54 P.2d 155 (Okla. 1936)). This legal opinion, filed in 1936-01-28, from the Supreme Court of Oklahoma discusses important legal matters. Access this case and related legal documents on Midpage, an AI-powered legal research platform.","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/magnolia-petroleum-co-v-carter--3832274"},"author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"url":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/magnolia-petroleum-co-v-carter--3832274","isPartOf":{"@type":"WebSite","name":"Midpage","url":"https://app.midpage.ai"},"inLanguage":"en","keywords":"legal, opinion, document, research, midpage, Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Carter County, Supreme Court of Oklahoma, Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Carter County, 54 P.2d 155 (Okla. 1936)","isAccessibleForFree":true,"isFamilyFriendly":true}34:T4c9, WELCH, J.

The property here involved is vacuum plants and vacuum lines leading to wells, and also vacuum lines leading from vacuum plants to gasoline plants, being similar to, if not identically of the same character as the property involved in Shaffer Oil & Refining Co. v. County Treasurer of Creek County, 175 Okla. 6, 52 P. (2d) 76.

The property here involved has the same dual use. and the rule announced in the Shaffer Case is controlling here. Under that rule the county court of Carter county must determine the taxable status of the property here involved on a pro rata basis according' to use. See, also, Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. State, 175 Okla. 11, 52 P. (2d) 81.

The judgment of the trial court is therefore reversed, and the cause remanded, with directions to proceed in accordance with the views herein expressed, and in keeping with the rule announced in Shaffer Oil & Refining Co. v. County Treasurer of Creek County, supra,

McNEILL, C. J.. and PHELPS, CORN, and GIBSON, J.T., concur.