midpage

Madden v. StateMadden v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
May 31, 2002
CR-00-2498
Versions:837 So. 2d 875
2002 WL 1139245
2002 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 126

Lead Opinion

McMILLAN, Presiding Judge.

AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.

*876COBB, SHAW, and WISE, JJ., concur. BASCHAB, J., dissents, with opinion.





Dissenting Opinion

BASCHAB, Judge,

dissenting.

I must respectfully dissent from the majority’s unpublished memorandum. The record in this case does not indicate that the trial court ever advised the appellant about the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation, as required by Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975). Therefore, we should reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand this case for a new trial. See Farid v. State, 720 So.2d 998 (Ala.Crim.App.1998); Hairgrove v. State, 680 So.2d 946 (Ala.Crim.App.1995).

Case Details

Case Name: Madden v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Date Published: May 31, 2002
Citations: 837 So. 2d 875; 2002 WL 1139245; 2002 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 126; CR-00-2498
Docket Number: CR-00-2498
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Crim. App.
Log In