111 Mich. App. 517 | Mich. Ct. App. | 1981
Plaintiff appeals as of right from a judgment entered after a bench trial dismissing with prejudice her complaint brought under the Paternity Act, MCL 722.711 et seq.; MSA 25.491 et seq.
Plaintiff filed this paternity action pursuant to MCL 722.714(c); MSA 25.494(c). She was represented by the Charlevoix County Prosecuting Attorney because she was receiving public assistance. Defendant, the putative father, denied paternity and demanded a blood test. The court-ordered blood test report indicated that defendant could not be excluded from paternity.
The plaintiff filed an affidavit with the trial court stating that she was receiving public assistance, thereby suspending her obligation to pay assessed costs and fees pursuant to GCR 1963,
"It is further ordered and adjudged that defendant shall recover from the County of Charlevoix, Department of Social Services, the costs and charges to be taxed in the sum of two hundred forty ($240.00) dollars.”
Two hundred dollars of those costs represent the cost of the blood test previously ordered to be paid by the defendant. The remaining 40 dollars represents the judgment fee and attorney fee.
Appellee argues that the trial court is empowered by MCL 722.716(c); MSA 25.496(c) to order the payment of these costs by the county. That statute provides:
"The court shall fix the compensation of any expert at a reasonable amount, and may direct the same to be paid by the county, or any other party to the case, or by both in such proportions and at such times as the court prescribes. Prior to making the test, the court may order any part or all of the compensation paid in advance.”
The Paternity Act permits a paternity proceeding to be commenced by the natural mother, by a county department of social services, or by a putative father. MCL 722.714(a), (h); MSA 25.494(a), (h). Where, as here, the action is initiated by the mother, the county department of social services is not a party to the action, although it may petition to be joined as a party plaintiff. See Barry County Dep’t of Social Services v Potter, 72 Mich App 233; 249 NW2d 370 (1976). The critical language contained in MCL 722.716(c); MSA 25.496(c) is the phrase "or any other party to the case”. Those
Plaintiff also argues that the trial court erred in dismissing her complaint upon finding that she had not proven that defendant was her child’s father by a preponderance of the evidence. GCR 1963, 517.1 provides that a trial court’s finding of fact shall not not be set aside unless clearly erroneous. We are not left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed and find no error requiring reversal.
Affirmed as modified.