Macquarie Holdings (USA) Inc. v. SongMacquarie Holdings (USA) Inc. v. Song
Since respondent‘s claims in this wrongful termination action are covered under the Form U-4, they fall within the “carve out” provision of the agreement and therefore are not subject to petitioner‘s mandatory arbitration procedures (see Credit Suisse First Boston Corp. v Pitofsky, 4 NY3d 149 [2005]). The agreement does not unambiguously supplant the Form U-4, and any ambiguity in the agreement must be construed against petitioner as the drafter thereof (see generally Yudell v Israel & Assoc., 248 AD2d 189, 189-190 [1998]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Moskowitz and Richter, JJ.