History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mackesy v. Maine
59 S. Ct. 230
SCOTUS
1938
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Harding v. Illinois, 196 U. S. 78, 86, 87; Capital City Dairy Co. v. Ohio, 183 U. S. 238, 248; (2) Nash v. United States, 229 U. S. 373, 377; Whitney v. California, 274 U. S. 357, 368, 369; Carter v. Texas, ante, p. 557.

Case Details

Case Name: Mackesy v. Maine
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Nov 21, 1938
Citation: 59 S. Ct. 230
Docket Number: No. 442
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.