History
  • No items yet
midpage
MacKenzie v. Rpt Boston No. 9 Ltd., No. Cv94 31 7683 (Nov. 17, 1994)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 11555
| Conn. Super. Ct. | 1994
|
Check Treatment

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]ORDER RE: MOTION TO STRIKE (NO. 110) The defendant, Highland Capital Corporation motion to strike the second and third count of the plaintiffs' revised complaint dated October 6, 1994 is granted.

Black's Law Dictionary, 6 Ed. defines "induce" as follows:

"To bring on or about, to affect, cause, to influence to an art or course of conduit, lead by persuasion or reasoning inate by motives, prevail on."

The use of the word "induce" does raise the claim in the second and third count to the level required by Weiss Associates, Inc. v. Wiederlight, 208 Conn. 525, 535-537. CT Page 11556

LAWRENCE L. HAUSER JUDGE

Case Details

Case Name: MacKenzie v. Rpt Boston No. 9 Ltd., No. Cv94 31 7683 (Nov. 17, 1994)
Court Name: Connecticut Superior Court
Date Published: Nov 17, 1994
Citation: 1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 11555
Docket Number: No. CV94 31 7683
Court Abbreviation: Conn. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.