History
  • No items yet
midpage
MacK v. Frito-Lay, Inc.
243 S.C. 376
S.C.
1963
Check Treatment
243 S.C. 376 (1963)
133 S.E.2d 833

Daisy B. MACK, Administratrix of the Estate of Deborah Ann Mack, Respondent,
v.
FRITO-LAY, INC. and Jack Martin, Appellants.

18145

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

December 18, 1963.

Messrs. Weinberg & Weinberg, of Sumter, for Appellants.

Messrs. W.L. Clifton and R. Kirk McLeod, of Sumter, for Respondent.

*377 December 18, 1963.

PER CURIAM.

This action for wrongful death resulted in a verdict for the defendants. Plaintiff's motion for a new trial upon the ground that the verdict was contrary to the preponderance of the evidence was granted by the court. The defendants appeal and charge error.

This appeal presents no issue for review by this Court under the well settled rule that a trial judge has the authority and duty to grant a new trial when, in his judgment, the verdict of the jury is contrary to the fair preponderance of the evidence, and such order is not appealable. Fuller v. Bailey, 237 S.C. 573, 118 S.E. (2d) 340; Donkle v. Forster, 238 S.C. 90, 119 S.E. (2d) 231; and Lee v. Kirby, S.C. 133 S.E. (2d) 127.

Appeal dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: MacK v. Frito-Lay, Inc.
Court Name: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Date Published: Dec 18, 1963
Citation: 243 S.C. 376
Docket Number: 18145
Court Abbreviation: S.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.