Macias v. City of New YorkMacias v. City of New York
In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rutledge, J.), dated November 19, 1991, as amended by an order of the same court, dated August 14, 1992, which denied its motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and granted the plaintiff’s cross motion to deem his late notice of claim timely served nunc pro tunc.
Ordered that the order as amended is modified, on the law, (1) by deleting the provision thereof granting the plaintiffs cross motion and substituting therefor a provision denying the cross motion, and (2) by deleting the provision thereof denying that branch of the appellant’s motion which was to dismiss the plaintiffs first cause of action for conscious pain and suffering and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order as amended is affirmed, with costs payable to the appellant.
The court was without the discretion to grant the plaintiffs cross motion, as it was not made within one year and 90 days after the claim for conscious pain and suffering accrued (see, General Municipal Law § 50-e; Pierson v City of New York,