History
  • No items yet
midpage
Macaulay Co. v. Winchell
259 A.D. 300
N.Y. App. Div.
1940
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

We agree with the Special Term that, although a small part of the matter alleged in the first separate and complete defense of truth and fair comment may be proper, the defense as presently pleaded does not fully meet the allegation of libel set forth in the complaint. It is fundamental that a plea in justification must be as broad as the charge and set forth the facts on which it is alleged that the charge as made is true. (Bingham v. Gaynor, 141 App. Div. 301; affd., 203 N. Y. 27, 34.) As the partial defense realleged by reference all of the allegations of theS first defense that 'had been stricken out, the order must be interpreted as striking ■out both the first defense and the first partial defense as pleaded.

*301The order, so far as appealed from, should be affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the plaintiff, with leave to defendants to serve an amended answer within twenty days after service of a copy of the order to be entered herein upon payment of said costs.

Present — Martin, P. J., Untermter, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendants to serve an amended answer within twenty days after service of order upon payment of said costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Macaulay Co. v. Winchell
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 19, 1940
Citation: 259 A.D. 300
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.