midpage

M.M. v. Volvo Car Financial Services US, L.L.C.M.M. v. Volvo Car Financial Services US, L.L.C.

District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 31, 2026
1:25-cv-07520

ORDER

ARUN SUBRAMANIAN, United States District Judge:

For the reasons stated on the record at the August 31, 2026 hearing, Volvo‘s motion to compel arbitration is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at Dkt. 12.

After the Court issued its ruling, both parties consented to individual conferences with the Court to discuss settlement. As part of those conversations, plaintiff made a new settlement demand which was communicated to counsel for defendant, who represented that he would discuss the new demand with his client. Because of the upcoming holiday, defendant requested 14 days to respond. Within 14 days, defendant should respond to plaintiff‘s new settlement demand.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 31, 2026

New York, New York

ARUN SUBRAMANIAN

United States District Judge

Case Details

Case Name: M.M. v. Volvo Car Financial Services US, L.L.C.
Court Name: District Court, S.D. New York
Date Published: Aug 31, 2026
Citation: 1:25-cv-07520
Docket Number: 1:25-cv-07520
Court Abbreviation: S.D.N.Y.
Log In