41 S.E. 974 | S.C. | 1902
June 12, 1902. The opinion of the Court was delivered by
The appeal herein is from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. A copy of the complaint will be seen by reference to the report of this case on former appeal, in
The opinion on the former appeal unquestionably shows that the complaint sets forth both a legal and an equitable cause of action, though they are commingled and not separately stated. While the causes of action are thus commingled, the complaint is not subject to demurrer, if either of the causes of action, separately stated, would not be demurrable on the ground interposed. Conceding that the demurrer could properly have been sustained to the legal cause of action, if it had been separately stated, we proceed to consider whether it could also have been sustained as to the equitable cause of action, if it had been separately stated. This question is conclusively disposed of by the case of Bomar v. Means,
It is the judgment of this Court, that the judgment of the Circuit Court be reversed.