History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lytle v. Prescott
57 Minn. 129
Minn.
1894
Check Treatment
Gilfillan, C. J.

Of the three assignments of error the first and third are bad under the rules, — the first, because it does not show whether it is taken to the court’s findings of fact or its conclusion of law, and, if to the findings of fact, it does not show to which of them (there being several); the third, because it assigns as error the denial of the motion for a new trial, without specifying to which of the several points made by the motion the assignment applies. There is no merit in the second assignment of error. There was evidence to sustain the finding referred to in it. Order affirmed.

Buck, J., absent, sick, took no part.

(Opinion published 58 N. W. 688.)

Case Details

Case Name: Lytle v. Prescott
Court Name: Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date Published: Apr 20, 1894
Citation: 57 Minn. 129
Docket Number: No. 8658
Court Abbreviation: Minn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.