History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lynn v. State
27 Tex. Ct. App. 590
| Tex. App. | 1889
|
Check Treatment
Willson, Judge.

This conviction is not supported by the evidence. It was not proved that the defendant committed the offense at a date prior to the presentment of the indictment. (Temple v. The State, 15 Texas Ct. App., 304.) It was not sufficiently proved that at the time the defendant played cards in the out house it was a place where people resorted. A witness testified that he had seen persons play cards in said out house one time prior to the time that the defendant played there, but did not state the time. It may have been so long prior as to have no bearing whatever in fixing the character of the place at the time defendant played there.

It was necessary that the State should prove that at the time defendant played in the out house it was then a place of resort; that is, a place where people were in the habit of going for gaming or other purposes. (The State v. Norton, 19 Texas, 102; Wheelock v. The State, 15 Texas, 260.)

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Serersed and remanded»

Case Details

Case Name: Lynn v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: May 15, 1889
Citation: 27 Tex. Ct. App. 590
Docket Number: No. 6379
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.