History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lynch v. United States
80 F.2d 390
9th Cir.
1935
Check Treatment
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

Elva E. . Lynch was indicted for passing and uttering a counterfeit coin (Criminal Code § 163, 18 U.S.C.A. § 277). Having been convicted and sentenced, she prosecutes this appeal. The only grounds of appeal urged in this court are that the trial court erred (1) in admitting testimony of two government witnesses, Fred Rottle and William Schlax; and (2) in admitting in evidence Government Exhibits 4 and 8. The first ground is untenable, because, in the trial court, the testimony of Rottle and Schlax was not objected to. Bruno v. United States (C.C.A.9) 67 F.(2d) 416, 419. The other ground is untenable, because, in the trial court, Exhibits 4 and 8 were not objected to on any of the grounds urged here. Crono v. United States (C.C.A.9) 59 F.(2d) 339, 340. It does not, in fact, appear from the record that any ground of objection was stated in the trial court.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Lynch v. United States
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Dec 9, 1935
Citation: 80 F.2d 390
Docket Number: No. 7886
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.