History
  • No items yet
midpage
880 So. 2d 817
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2004
PER CURIAM.

Having considered appellant’s “Objection to Motion to Dismiss,” filed on June 28, 2004, which we treat as a response to our order to show cause, issued on May 26, 2004, this appeal is hereby dismissed as premature. See Dep’t of Children & Families v. Monroe, 744 So.2d 1163, 1164 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Additionally, the nonfinal order determining entitlement to attorneys’ fees is not appealable pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(I). Fisher v. Int'l Longshoremen’s Ass’n, 827 So.2d 1096 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

Appellees’ motion to dismiss, filed on May 25, 2004, is denied as moot. Appel-lees’ motion for attorneys’ fees, filed on May 25, 2004, is also denied. Cf. Churchville v. Ocean Grove R.V. Sales, Inc., 876 So.2d 649 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

BOOTH, WEBSTER and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Lydolph v. Davidson
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Aug 13, 2004
Citations: 880 So. 2d 817; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11816; 2004 WL 1800644; No. 1D04-2083
Docket Number: No. 1D04-2083
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In