History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lydem v. DePiera
147 So. 2d 573
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1962
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The appellant, plaintiff in the trial court, seeks review of a final judgment rendered in favor of the defendant following a non-jury trial.

*574Unfortunately, the trial proceedings were not transcribed and the record has not been perfected in accordance with the principles announced in Potash v. Dry & Company, 8 Fla.Supp. 174, which procedure was cited with approval by this court in Moyer v. Moyer, Fla.App.1959, 114 So.2d 638.

Therefore, not having the evidence before us that was taken in the trial court, we have no alternative but to affirm the final judgment. See: Hall v. Davis, Fla.App. 1958, 106 So.2d 599.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Lydem v. DePiera
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Dec 18, 1962
Citation: 147 So. 2d 573
Docket Number: No. 62-290
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.