History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lutz v. Houck
292 U.S. 603
SCOTUS
1934
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Hayes v. Missouri, 120 U.S. 68, 71, 72; Budd v. New York, 143 U.S. 517, 548; Toyota v. Hawaii, 226 U.S. 184, 191, 192; Packard v. Banton, 264 U.S. 140, 143, 144; Radice v. New York, 264 U.S. 292, 296; Miller v. Wilson, 236 U.S. 373, 384; Price v. Illinois, 238 U.S. 446, 453; Silver v. Silver, 280 U.S. 117, 123, 124; Sproles v. Binford, 286 U.S. 374, 396.

Case Details

Case Name: Lutz v. Houck
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Apr 30, 1934
Citation: 292 U.S. 603
Docket Number: No. 919
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.