History
  • No items yet
midpage
Luri v. Republic Services, Inc.
971 N.E.2d 944
Ohio
2012
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} The certified question in case No. 2011-1097 is answered in the negative, and the cross-appellants’ first proposition of law in case No. 2011-1120 is sustained. Appellant’s discretionary appeal in case No. 2011-1120 is moot. The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded for application of Havel v. Villa St. Joseph, 131 Ohio St.3d 235, 2012-Ohio-552, 963 N.E.2d 1270.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, L.L.P., Robin G. Weaver, Stephen P. Anway, and Trevor G. Covey, for appellants in case No. 2011-1097 and for appellees and cross-appellants in case No. 2011-1120.

Case Details

Case Name: Luri v. Republic Services, Inc.
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 3, 2012
Citation: 971 N.E.2d 944
Docket Number: Nos. 2011-1097 and 2011-1120
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In