History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lupo v. Lineberger
311 Ark. 80
Ark.
1992
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Dr. David A. Lupo, the petitioner, seeks writs of prohibition and certiorari to prevent his having to give a deposition as an expert witness involuntarily in the case of William Rodgers, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Patricia Rodgers v. Dr. Robert Teryl Brooks, Jefferson County Circuit Court No. 91-439-2-3. Counsel for William Rodgers has subpoenaed Dr. Lupo, contending that he will only be asked “factual” questions rather than for expert opinion. Dr. Lupo asserts that the “facts” he expects to be asked are within his knowledge only because of his status as an expert and he should not have to submit involuntarily to the deposition.

All proceedings, including discovery, in Rodgers v. Brooks, are temporarily stayed. Counsel for the petitioner and for the respondent are ordered to brief the issue fully pursuant to Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Rule 16 and 7. In addition to the merits of the question presented by the petition, the parties are directed to brief the question of the propriety of a writ of certiorari in the circumstances presented in this case.

Case Details

Case Name: Lupo v. Lineberger
Court Name: Supreme Court of Arkansas
Date Published: Nov 9, 1992
Citation: 311 Ark. 80
Docket Number: 92-1168
Court Abbreviation: Ark.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.