Luke v. Wainwright, 431 F.2d 485

PER CURIAM:

The sole issue on this appeal from the denial of petition for habeas corpus is whether the comments of the prosecutor in closing argument to the jury in the state trial constituted comment upon the failure of appellants to take the stand and testify in their own behalf.

We agree with the district court, after a study of the remarks in question, that the jury could not have interpreted them as commentary on the failure of the appellants to take the stand, and therefore affirm. Garcia v. United States, 5th Cir. 1963, 315 F.2d 133; Samuels v. United States, 5th Cir. 1968, 398 F.2d 964; Williams v. Wainwright, 5th Cir. 1969, 416 F.2d 1042; Parks v. Wainwright, 5th Cir. 1970, 429 F.2d 1240.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Luke v. Wainwright

Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Date Published: Sep 17, 1970

Citations: 431 F.2d 485; Nos. 29573, 29577

Docket Number: Nos. 29573, 29577

Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.