History
  • No items yet
midpage
Luehrs v. Wells Fargo Bank, Na
314 S.W.3d 624
Tex. App.
2010
Check Treatment

OPINION PER CURIAM

PER CURIAM.

Before the Court is appellees’ April 14, 2010 motion to dismiss for want of prosecution. In the motion, appellees note that following an extension of time, appellant’s brief was due March 30, 2010 but had not been filed. To date, appellant has failed to file her brief, respond to appellees’ motion to dismiss, or otherwise communicate with the Court regarding this appeal. Accordingly, we GRANT appellees’ motion and DISMISS this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex.R.App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

Case Details

Case Name: Luehrs v. Wells Fargo Bank, Na
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Jun 2, 2010
Citation: 314 S.W.3d 624
Docket Number: 05-09-01402-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.