History
  • No items yet
midpage
314 S.W.3d 624
Tex. App.
2010

OPINION PER CURIAM

PER CURIAM.

Before the Court is appellees’ April 14, 2010 motion to dismiss for want of prosecution. In the motion, appellees note that following an extension of time, appellant’s brief was due March 30, 2010 but had not been filed. To date, appellant has failed to file her brief, respond to appellees’ motion to dismiss, or otherwise communicate with the Court regarding this appeal. Accordingly, we GRANT appellees’ motion and DISMISS this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex.R.App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

Case Details

Case Name: Luehrs v. Wells Fargo Bank, Na
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Jun 2, 2010
Citations: 314 S.W.3d 624; 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 4151; 2010 WL 2180381; 05-09-01402-CV
Docket Number: 05-09-01402-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Luehrs v. Wells Fargo Bank, Na, 314 S.W.3d 624