The petitioner in this quo warranto action contends that Heyward Woodward, the respondent, should be removed from the office of county commissioner of Rockdale County because he had not resided in that county for five years prior to his election on November 2, 1976, as would be required by the 1941 local act establishing the office. 1 The trial court overruled Woodward’s motion to dismiss which challenged the statute on constitutional grounds, but after a hearing on June 17, 1977, the trial court denied quo warranto. Both parties have appealed.
The Georgia Constitution provides that no person shall be a "county officer” unless he shall have been a resident of the county for two years. 2 We must decide whether a county commissioner is a county officer within the meaning of this constitutional provision, and if so, whether the General Assembly may impose a longer residency requirement than is fixed by our Constitution.
*771
1. Are county commissioners county officers within the meaning of the Constitution? Code Ann. § 2-5808. The conflict in Georgia authority on this issue has been previously noted.
Smith v. Abercrombie,
Several decisions hold that the county commissioners are county officers within the meaning of the constitutional provision. County commissioners were found to be such county officers in
Hulgan v. Thornton,
The case of
Marshall v. Walker,
On the other hand,
Rhodes v. Jernigan, 155
Ga. 523 (2) (
We are not unmindful of those provisions of the Constitution which allow the General Assembly much *774 authority to establish the duties, powers and jurisdiction of and the remedies against county commissioners. 8 "[These provisions] in regard to creation of county commissioners and defining their duties [were] not intended, however, to authorize the legislature to violate every other provision in the constitution under the name of defining the duties of the county commissioners . . .” Board of Commrs. of Sumter County v. Mayor &c. of Americus, supra. These two provisions do not clearly except county commissioners from the constitutional provisions of Code Ann. § 2-5808 regarding county officers. "The different provisions of the constitution are to be construed as in harmony with one another rather than as contradictory.” Board of Commrs. of Sumter County, supra, at 544. We hold that the office of county commissioner is a county office governed by the constitutional provisions of what is now the Constitution of 1976 (Art. IX, Sec. I, Par. VIII; Code Ann. § 2-5808).
2. May the General Assembly impose a residency requirement as a condition of eligibility to an office of county commissioner longer than the requirement fixed by the Constitution that a county officer ". . . shall have been a resident of the county for two years”? Code Ann. § 2-5808. In
White v. Clements,
We find that the condition in Ga. Laws 1941, pp. 952 to 954, supra, which requires five years residence for eligibility to the office of county commissioners is invalid because the Constitution requires that a county officer shall have been a resident of the county for two years. Therefore the judgment denying quo warranto is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Notes
Ga. L. 1941, pp. 952, 954: "No person shall be elected as Commissioner of said County [Rockdale] unless he be of thirty years of age and having had residence in said County five years prior to his election.”
"The county officers shall be elected by the qualified voters of their respective counties or districts, and shall hold their office for four years. They shall be removed upon conviction for malpractice in office; and no person shall be eligible for any of the offices referred to in this Paragraph unless he shall have been a resident of the county for two years and is a qualified voter.” 1976 Const., Art. IX, Sec. I, Par. VIII; Code Ann. § 2-5808 (1977); 1945 Const., Art. IX, Sec. II, Par. I; Code Ann. § 2-7901 (1946); 1877 Const., Art. XI, Sec. II, Par. I, as amended; Code Ann. § 2-8301 (1933); Code § 6599 (1910); Code § 5929 (1895), Code § 5227 (1882). See 1868 Const., Art. IX, Par. I; Code § 5140 (1873).
The use of the word "districts” in the constitutional provision confirms the correctness of the decision we reach today because county commissioners are the only county officials elected from districts within the county. Other county officials are elected from the county at large. Hence the inclusion of "districts” was a reference to county commissioners. Regarding county school officials, see
Saxon v. Bell,
Code Ann. § 89-101(7) (Supp. 1977); Code § 258(7) (1910); Code § 223 (7) (1895).
Our holding today with regard to the constitutional qualifications of the office of county commissioner is not intended to affect other limits which may have been established by the Constitution on the broad legislative power to establish thé duties, powers, and jurisdiction of and the remedies against a county commissioner. See, e. g.,
County of Pulaski v. Thompson & Co.,
Ga. L. 1914, p. 43, ratified Nov. 3,1914, to be effective January 1, 1917. See editorial note following Code § 2-8301 (1933). The correctness of the decision in Rhodes v. Jernigan, supra, is put in doubt when it is found that at the 1915 and 1916 sessions of the General Assembly, the county commissioners of many counties were given four year terms effective January 1, 1917. Ga. L. 1915, p. 140 et seq.; Ga. L. 1916, p. 332 et seq.
Dicta in
Employees Retirement System v. Lewis,
1976 Const., Art. IX, Sec. I, Par. VI (Code Ann. § 2-5806) provides in pertinent part: "Whatever tribunal, or officers, may be created by the General Assembly for the transaction of county matters, shall be uniform throughout the State, and of the same name, jurisdiction, and remedies, except that the General Assembly may provide for County Commissioners in any county . . . without respect to uniformity.” See 1945 Const., Art. XI, Sec. I, Par. VI; 1877 Const., Art. IX, Sec. I, Par. VI.
1976 Const., Art. IX, Sec. I, Par. VII (Code Ann. § 2-5807) provides: "The General Assembly shall have power to provide for the creation of county commissioners in such counties as may require them and to define their duties.” See 1945 Const., Art. VI, Sec. XVII, Par. I; Const. 1877, Art. IX, Sec. I, Par. VII.
See also footnote 5.
