History
  • No items yet
midpage
743 F.3d 886
4th Cir.
2013

Lead Opinion

ORDER

Petition for panel rehearing was filed by appellant, Family Dollar Stores, Inc. The court denies the petition for panel rehearing.

Entered at the direction of Judge Gregory with the concurrence of Judge Keenan. Judge Wilkinson filed an opinion dissenting from the denial of panel rehearing.






Concurrence Opinion

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge,

dissenting from the denial of panel rehearing:

I vote to grant panel rehearing and would promptly affirm the district court’s denial of class certification in this case. Inasmuch as the panel majority declines to do this, the central issue is best settled, if not in this action, then sometime soon, by the Supreme Court of the United States. To have the centralized delegation of discretion to 500 middle managers across the country expose a company to a nationwide class action seems to me so contrary to the Court’s Wal-Mart decision as to whittle it down to near meaninglessness. I do not intend to repeat the points set forth in my dissenting opinion other than to note that the evisceration of Wal-Mart marks no more than the beginning of the problems in class action litigation generated by the majority’s decision.

Case Details

Case Name: Luanna Scott v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 14, 2013
Citations: 743 F.3d 886; 120 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1102; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 22961; 2013 WL 7767704; 12-1610
Docket Number: 12-1610
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In