*1 886 overnight
home and bag. his We will court denies the petition panel for rehear- therefore the District affirm Court’s order ing.
denying suppress. his to motion Entered at the Judge direction of Greg-
ory with the Judge concurrence of Keenan. Judge Wilkinson opinion filed an dissent- ing from panel the denial rehearing. of SCOTT; Garlington; Luanna Shunderia WILKINSON, Judge, Circuit dissenting Beth; Wendy Bevis; Ruth Katherine from panel the denial of rehearing: Bracey; Ruby Brady; Marie Alice I grant vote to panel rehearing and Brockway; Clutter; Vickie Diane promptly would affirm the district court’s Conaway; Judy Corrow; Davis; Traci denial of class in certification this case. Dinolfo; Dixon; Carol Rebecca Pame panel Inasmuch as the majority declines to Ewalt; Nancy Fehling; la Teresa this, do the settled, central issue is best if Fleming; Grace; Dorothy Irene Har- action, not in this soon, then sometime by son; Hazelton; Shelly Charlene Supreme the Court of the United States. Hughes; Joslyn; Christal J. Ada L. To have the delegation centralized of dis- Kennedy; Lafreniere; Margie Neita cretion to 500 middle managers across the Little; Martin; A. Carol Leanne Max country expose company a to a nationwide well; Mayfield; Moody; Wanda Doris class action seems to so contrary me to the Peeples; Perry- Vanessa L. Veronica Court’s Wal-Mart decision as to whittle it Preddie; Phelps; Ruth Ellen Sheila down to near meaninglessness. I do not Pippin; Radosh; Lana Michelle repeat intend to points the set forth in my Rodgers; Rose; Vickey Vada Jo dissenting opinion other than to note that Scrivwer; Silva; Linda R. Sharon the evisceration of Wal-Mart marks no Sipes; Nancy Smith; Spell Marie E. more than the beginning of problems the is; Sylvia Tenorio; Judy Tidrick; C. in class action litigation generated by the Beverly Triplett; L. Carol Sue Van majority’s decision. fleet; Vasquez; White; Debbie Claire Williams; Cindy Bonnie Zim Marie
brich, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
and Fulmer;
Linda L. MacQuarrie; Jean Zimmerman, Helen Plaintiffs, FEDERAL COMMISSION, TRADE
v. Plaintiff-Appellee, STORES, FAMILY INC., DOLLAR v. Defendant-Appellee. Kristy ROSS, individually and as No. 12-1610. officer Marketing, of Innovative United Appeals, States Court of Inc., Defendant-Appellant,
Fourth Circuit. and 14, Nov. 2013. Marketing, Inc., Innovative Winso d/b/a ORDER FZ-LLC, lutions Billingnow, d/b/a Petition for panel rehearing Winpayment by Consultancy was filed SPC, d/b/a appellant, Family Stores, Dollar Ltd., Inc. The BillPlanet PTE Reve- d/b/a d/b/a