History
  • No items yet
midpage
24 N.Y.3d 1048
NY
2014

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, and petition dismissed. We cannot say that “the penalty of [termination] . . . shocks the judicial conscience” (Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 40 [2001]; see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, 234-235 [1974]).

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam.

Case Details

Case Name: Lozinak v. Board of Education
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 17, 2014
Citations: 24 N.Y.3d 1048; 23 N.E.3d 1021
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In