History
  • No items yet
midpage
Loyola v. State
471 So. 2d 221
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1985
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Defendant, who was sentenced under the sentencing guidelines, contends on appeal *222that the offense occurred before October 1, 1983, and that he did not affirmatively elect guidelines sentencing. Since the record is unclear as to whether or not defendant elected to be sentenced under the guidelines, we remand for another sentencing hearing. See Jordan v. State, 460 So.2d 477 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOON-OVER and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Loyola v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jun 28, 1985
Citation: 471 So. 2d 221
Docket Number: No. 84-2078
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.