History
  • No items yet
midpage
Loy v. Coey
31 Wash. 684
Wash.
1903
Check Treatment
Pee Curiam.

— The respondent moves to dismiss this appeal for the reason that the alleged appeal hond is ineffectual, in that the penalty of said bond, which purports to be an appeal and supersedeas bond, is not double the amount of the judgment and $200, required by the statute for bond on appeal. This case falls squarely within the rule announced in Pierce v. Willeby, 20 Wash. 129 (54 Pac. 999); Town of Sumner v. Rogers, 21 Wash. 361 (58 Pac. 214); Galloway v. Tjossem, 22 Wash. 163 (60 Pac. 129); Beezley v. Sessions, 22 Wash. 125 (60 Pac. 130); and Graham v. American Surely Co., 28 Wash. 735 (69 Pac. 365).

The motion will be sustained, and the appeal dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Loy v. Coey
Court Name: Washington Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 7, 1903
Citation: 31 Wash. 684
Docket Number: No. 4470
Court Abbreviation: Wash.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.