The question now for decision arises upon the motion of plaintiffs against the claimants to produce upon the trial of this issue the books, papers, correspondence, and documents in their possession or under their control relating to the dealings between them and the defendants, Carey & Richardson. This motion is resisted by the claimants, and the question is, shall the motion be sustained and the rule made? This motion is made under section 724, Rev. St., which reads as follows:
*812 “In the trial of actions at law, the courts of the United States may,on motion and due notice thereof, require the parties to produce books or writings in their possession or power, which contain evidence pertinent to the issue, in eases and under circumstances where they might be compelled to produce the same by the ordinary rules of proceedings in chancery. If a plaintiff fails to comply with such order, the court may on motion give judgment as in case of nonsuit, and if a defendant fails to comply with such order, the court may on motion give judgment against him as by default.”
The proper practice under this statute is for the party requiring the production of such books or writings to spread on the motion docket a motion for a rule upon the opposite party requiring the production of the books or papers desired. The motion should describe the books or papers with as much certainty as may be, and should further state that, according to the best of the mover’s knowledge or information and belief, the books or papers called for will tend to prove the issue in favor of the mover. The motion should further state some fact or facts which the books or papers will tend to prove, pertinent to the issue, which issue should be made up before the motion is made, so that the court may determine the pertinency of the fact or facts which it is alleged the books or papers will tend to prove. What they will prove can only be determined after their production.
The truth of the allegations stated in the motion should be verified by the affidavit of the mover, or his agent, and the materiality of the testimony sought by the production of the books or papers certified to by the counsel of the mover. Notice must be given the party fequired to produce the books or writings, or his attorney, a sufficient length of time for the party to appear and show cause, if any he has, why the rule shall not be made, when he may, in opposition to the rule, show by affidavit that he has no such books or papers under his control, or any other reason he may have why the rule shall not be made. 'If any issue is made upon thq motion the court will hear proof, and grant or refuse the rule according to the proof and nature of the ease.
The claimants insist that this motion comes too late. The issue could not well have been tried until after the attachment suit was tried and the judgment rendered against the defendants in the attachment suits. Indeed, the issues have not been made up. I am satisfied the motion is in time, but the grounds stated in the motion are not as full and specific as they should be. The movers will have leave to amend the motion so as to conform to the rule stated, when sufficient time will be allowed the claimants to answer the motion,
