Lovitt v. CommonwealthLovitt v. Commonwealth
- Reporters:
- ,
Loy Lovitt, Jr., the movant, was indicted and convicted of three counts of theft by deception in violation of
The record is clear that the Commonwealth did not comply with the requirements of
Although there is not complete agreement among state jurisdictions in construing the requirements of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act, which Chapter 440 of KRS adopts, we agree with Judge Reynolds of the Court of Appeals who dissented on the basis that the better reasoned cases and in particular Pittman v. State, 301 A.2d 509 (Del.1973) required reversal. We agree with the construction of the requirements of the detainer act made by the Supreme Court of Delaware. Mov-ant’s other contentions of error need not be addressed.
The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the McCracken Circuit Court with direction that the indictment be dismissed.
All concur.