Lovejoy v. Wilson

15 F. Cas. 1000 | U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia | 1802

KILTY, Chief Judge,

was of opinion that the evidence was applicable to that count. No account being filed, the words “as by a particular account,” &c., must be rejected as surplusage, and then the count will stand as a general indebitatus assumpsit “for sundry matters chargeable in account;” and money lent is a matter chargeable in account.

MARSHALL, Circuit Judge, and CRANCH, Circuit Judge, did not object

(Quaere as to this point.)