midpage

Love v. StateLove v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Aug 31, 2001
No. 5D99-2133
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Harris
HARRIS, J.

Finding that the prosecutor’s statements during closing argument do not warrant a reversal, we affirm appellant’s conviction and habitual offender sentence for sale of cocaine. Because the record on appeal is unclear regarding whether appellant actually pled to violation of probation in case number 95-19638 at or prior to the sentencing herein, we remand to the trial court for determination and resolution. At the same time, we remand to the trial court for reconsideration of its habitual offender sentence on the charge of possession of cocaine in light of section 775.084(l)(a)(3), Florida Statutes.

AFFIRMED in part; ISSUES REMANDED for reconsideration.

COBB and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Love v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Aug 31, 2001
Citations: 792 So. 2d 710; 2001 WL 991979; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12253; No. 5D99-2133
Docket Number: No. 5D99-2133
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In