Louisville N. R. Co. v. Langston
216 Ala. 693
| Ala. | 1927

The question whether the workman in this case was totally disabled by the accident he suffered was a question of fact, as to which there was some conflict in the evidence. Such questions are not reviewable. The court here finds that the decree was substantially correct and will order an affirmance. Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.