Louisville & Portland Canal Co. v. Holborn
2 Blackf. 267 | Ind. | 1829
A., to whom B. was indebted, levied an attachment on certain goods as B.’s property. C., the owner of the goods, brought an action of replevin against A. and recovered
Replevin lies in such cases as that in the text; and it is no objection to the action that the goods are in the custody of the law. Chinn v. Russell, ante, p. 172, and note (3).
