23 S.W.2d 398 | Tex. App. | 1930
By the first and second assignments of error it is contended that the court erred in overruling the appellant's objections made to the following questions to the plaintiff and his answers thereto, namely: (1) "Did you listen for an approaching train?" And (2) "Did you make an effort to stop your car?" The plaintiff answered each question, "Yes." The objections made were that the questions were leading questions. The case of Ry. Co. v. Dalwigh,
The third assignment of error is based upon the testimony of the appellee as to the value of his automobile before the collision. The verdict of the jury is fully supported by evidence of the value of the car, independent of the appellee's evidence, and the assignment is therefore overruled because the ruling of the court, if error at all, was harmless.
The seventh assignment of error complains of the verdict being excessive. We are not prepared to set aside the findings by the jury as to the amount of damages.
The other assignments present objections to evidence that we think do not warrant a reversal of the judgment. The assignments are therefore overruled.
The judgment is affirmed.