History
  • No items yet
midpage
Loud v. Merrill
47 Me. 351
Me.
1860
Check Treatment

In an action upon a promissory note, though, the suit is by an indorsee against an indorser, and the note is payable in another State, no damages for protest are allowed, as upon bills of exchange.

Upon being informally presented again by cpunsel, and *352argued upon that point, the Court were unanimously of the opinion, that promissory notes, though negotiated, were not within the provisions of § 35, c. 82, of the B. S. of 1851, relating to that subject; and no such damages were allowed.

Case Details

Case Name: Loud v. Merrill
Court Name: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Date Published: Jul 1, 1860
Citation: 47 Me. 351
Court Abbreviation: Me.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.