History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lott v. Graves
67 Ala. 40
Ala.
1880
Check Treatment
STONE, J.

— The law casts on the surviving husband the duty and legal obligation of burying his deceased wife, and of paying for the proper funeral expenses. No one, except the wife by her own contract, can fasten a charge on ber equitable separate estate. It follows that neither the surviving husband, nor any one else, after the death of tbe owner of such estate, can incur any debt, for which the estate can be made liable.— Gunn v. Samuel, 33 Ala. 201; Smyley v. Reese, 53 Ala. 89. Tbe expense of burying Mrs. Lott -was in no sense a debt due from her estate, and could not constitute the owner of such claim a creditor of ber estate. Graves, not being a creditor of hers, had no claim or right, on that account, to the administration of ber estate, and the claim was not a debt, to justify tbe sale of her property for its payment. — Owens v. Childs, 59 Ala. 113; Garrett v. Bruner.

Reversed and remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Lott v. Graves
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Dec 15, 1880
Citation: 67 Ala. 40
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.