History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lott & Co. v. Strickland
30 S.E. 872
Ga.
1898
Check Treatment
Lewis, J.

There was no error of law committed, in the light of the explanation given by the trial judge; and there being some evidence-to sustain the finding against the defendants, we will not interfere-with the discretion of the court below in refusing to grant a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Case Details

Case Name: Lott & Co. v. Strickland
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: May 27, 1898
Citation: 30 S.E. 872
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.