Loriann Q. v. Frank R.Loriann Q. v. Frank R.
The mother limits her argument on appeal to the contention that the evidence established a family offense against her daughter and, thus, Family Court erred in not granting an order of protection in favor of her daughter. While the mother had standing to bring the family offense proceeding on behalf of her daughter (see Matter of Hamm-Jones v Jones, 14 AD3d 956, 959 [2005]), we are unpersuaded that this record requires issuing an order of protection. The two allegations regarding the daughter were remote, both had been investigated by Child Protective Services (which found no concern for the child‘s safety), and there was no demonstration of current danger to the child (see Matter of Ashley P., 31 AD3d 767, 769 [2006]).
Mercure, J.P., Rose, Kavanagh and Stein, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.