midpage

Lord v. Folmar & SonLord v. Folmar & Son

Supreme Court of Alabama
Dec 15, 1877
Reporters:
Before:
Stone
STONE, J.

The deed offered ‍​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‍in evidence, being without a subscribing witness, and ‍​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‍without acknowledgment, was inoperative as a conveyance of ‍​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‍title, and should not have been received in ‍​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‍evidence. — Code of 1876, § 2145; Hendon v. White, 52 ‍​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‍Ala. 597.

Reversed and remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Lord v. Folmar & Son
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Dec 15, 1877
Citation: 57 Ala. 615
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
Log In