midpage

Lord of Shalford v. Shelley's Jewelry, Inc.Lord of Shalford v. Shelley's Jewelry, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Sep 10, 2001
01-1077
Versions:

Thomas, Lord of Shalford, Linda, Lady of Shalford, pro se. Frank J. Contrivo, Andrew James Santaniello, Frank J. Contrivo, P.A., Asheville, NC, for appellees.

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Thomas, Lord of Shalford, and Linda, Lady of Shalford, appeal the district court‘s order granting summary judgment in this diversity action. We have reviewed the record and the district court‘s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lord of Shalford v. Shelley‘s Jewelry, Inc., No. CA-99-162-1 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 28, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case Details

Case Name: Lord of Shalford v. Shelley's Jewelry, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Sep 10, 2001
Citations: 18 F. App'x 147; 01-1077
Docket Number: 01-1077
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
Log In
    Lord of Shalford v. Shelley's Jewelry, Inc., 18 F. App'x 147