History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lord of Shalford v. Shelley's Jewelry, Inc.
18 F. App'x 147
4th Cir.
2001
Check Treatment
Docket

Thomas, LORD OF SHALFORD; Linda, Lady of Shalford, his wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SHELLEY‘S JEWELRY, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Shelley‘s Auction Gallery; Joette M. Humphrey; John F. Laughter; Billy R. Ramsey; Keith G. Shelley; Stanley R. Shelley, Defendants-Appellees, and Jewelers Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant.

No. 01-1077

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Decided Sept. 10, 2001

Submitted May 31, 2001

147

Thomas, Lord of Shalford, Linda, Lady of Shalford, pro se. Frank J. Contrivo, Andrew James Santaniello, Frank J. Contrivo, P.A., Asheville, NC, for appellees.

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Thomas, Lord of Shalford, and Linda, Lady of Shalford, appeal the district court‘s order granting summary judgment in this diversity action. We have reviewed the record and the district court‘s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lord of Shalford v. Shelley‘s Jewelry, Inc., No. CA-99-162-1 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 28, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case Details

Case Name: Lord of Shalford v. Shelley's Jewelry, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Sep 10, 2001
Citation: 18 F. App'x 147
Docket Number: 01-1077
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In