History
  • No items yet
midpage
Long v. State
1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 404
| Tex. Crim. App. | 1913
|
Check Treatment

Appellant was convicted of murder in the first degree, his punishment being assessed at death.

There are quite a number of grounds set out in the motion for new trial. Most of these are criticisms of the court's charge as not submitting the law properly as called for by the facts, or properly submitting the law under the facts detailed by the witnesses. The evidence is not before us. There is no statement of facts sent up with this transcript. These matters urged in the motion for new trial can not be revised in the absence of the evidence.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

[Rehearing denied October 15, 1913. — Reporter.]

Case Details

Case Name: Long v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Jun 25, 1913
Citation: 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 404
Docket Number: No. 2609.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.