| N.J. | May 24, 1917

Per Curiam.

Legal questions were first dealt with in the opinion of Mr. Justice Parker in the court below, so as to lay a foundation for the consideration of the facts, and those questions were, in our opinion, rightly decided. As there was evidence to support the finding of facts made by the Supreme Court, that finding is not reviewahle-in this court.

The judgment under review will be affirmed.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Black, White, Heppbniteimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.

For reversal—Hone.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.