History
  • No items yet
midpage
London v. State
502 So. 2d 1015
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1987
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction but reverse the sentencing order with directions that the trial court impose a sentence no more than one cell higher than the sentencing guidelines call for because of his probation violation, see Boldes v. State, 475 So.2d 1356 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), unless the trial court determines that there are clear and convincing reasons for deviating further from the guidelines.

ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and KLEIN, HERBERT M., Associate Judge, concur.

Case Details

Case Name: London v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Feb 25, 1987
Citation: 502 So. 2d 1015
Docket Number: No. 4-86-1209
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.