London v. State

502 So. 2d 1015 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1987

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction but reverse the sentencing order with directions that the trial court impose a sentence no more than one cell higher than the sentencing guidelines call for because of his probation violation, see Boldes v. State, 475 So.2d 1356 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), unless the trial court determines that there are clear and convincing reasons for deviating further from the guidelines.

ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and KLEIN, HERBERT M., Associate Judge, concur.