History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lomas, R. v. Kravitz, J., Pets
2016 Pa. LEXIS 1869
| Pa. | 2016
|
Check Treatment

*0 JAMES B. KRAVITZ, CHERRYDALE CONSTRUCTION CO., ANDORRA SPRINGS DEVELOPMENT, INC., AND KRAVMAR, INC. F/K/A EASTERN DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES INC.,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT ROY H. LOMAS, SR., D/B/A ROY LOMAS : No. 52 MAL 2016 CARPET CONTRACTOR, :

: Respondent : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

: the Order of the Superior Court : v. :

: : : : : : : : : Petitioners :

ORDER PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 24th day of August, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED , LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

(1) Whether, as a matter of law, the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas

should have been recused from presiding over the non-jury trial due to an appearance of impropriety arising from the ongoing participation and financial interest in the litigation by a sitting member of that Court?

(2) Whether, as a matter of law, an appearance of impropriety was created when a

sitting member of the Montgomery County Bench personally participated in the litigation?

Justices Donohue and Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Case Details

Case Name: Lomas, R. v. Kravitz, J., Pets
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Aug 24, 2016
Citation: 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1869
Docket Number: 52 MAL 2016 (Granted)
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.