Logan v. JohnsonLogan v. Johnson
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The only issue on this appeal is whether the Supreme Court properly determined that the plaintiff was liable to the defendant for unpaid rent.
When the plaintiff continued to reside at the defendant’s premises through July 2004 after his written lease expired in July 1998, the provisions in the lease remained in force for as long as he remained in possession of the premises (see City of New York v Pennsylvania R.R. Co.,