History
  • No items yet
midpage
Logan v. American Motors Corp. of N.J.
102 N.J.L. 220
| N.J. | 1925
|
Check Treatment

The judges being equally divided on the question whether the judgment should be reversed, the judgment is affirmed solely because of such division, which renders any opinion by the court impossible. The judgment under review will be affirmed, solely because the judges are equally divided on the question as to whether such judgment should be reversed.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, LLOYD, JJ. 7.

For reversal — KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 7.

Case Details

Case Name: Logan v. American Motors Corp. of N.J.
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Dec 24, 1925
Citation: 102 N.J.L. 220
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.